For decades, we fought cancer cell by cell. Then, a visionary surgeon asked a radical question: What if we could starve the enemy instead?
In the 1960s, the war on cancer was a brutal, direct assault. The primary weapons were surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy—all designed to cut, burn, or poison tumors. But a young surgeon named Dr. Judah Folkman was troubled. He had seen too many patients relapse after seemingly successful operations. Tiny, undetectable tumors would lie dormant, only to explode into devastating, inoperable growth years later.
He called this process tumor angiogenesis. His theory was simple: if a tumor is a growing city, it needs roads and highways—new blood vessels—to bring in food and oxygen and carry away waste. No roads, no growth. This led to an even more radical proposal: could we cure cancer not by attacking the tumor itself, but by cutting off its supply lines?
For over a decade, this was a lonely fight. The scientific community dismissed his "angiogenesis" theory as fantasy. But Folkman and his small band of researchers persisted, embarking on a quest that would forever change our understanding of cancer and open up a whole new front in the war against it.
A visionary surgeon and researcher who pioneered the field of angiogenesis research despite initial skepticism from the scientific community.
Instead of attacking cancer cells directly, Folkman proposed starving tumors by cutting off their blood supply - a completely new approach to cancer treatment.
At its core, angiogenesis is the body's process of forming new blood vessels from pre-existing ones. It's a vital part of healing wounds and of female reproductive cycles. But Folkman realized that cancer was hijacking this normal, healthy process.
Angiogenesis is the physiological process through which new blood vessels form from pre-existing vessels. It is a normal and vital process in growth and development, as well as in wound healing. However, it is also a fundamental step in the transition of tumors from a dormant state to a malignant one.
Tumors, he theorized, release chemical signals called angiogenic factors that act as "GO" signals, tricking nearby blood vessels into growing toward the tumor. This switch to an angiogenic state is what Folkman termed the "angiogenic switch." Once flipped, a dormant, harmless cluster of cells becomes a voracious, life-threatening growth.
The struggle was to prove it. The key was to isolate these mysterious "GO" signals and demonstrate that blocking them could halt cancer in its tracks.
The critical transition point when a tumor gains the ability to recruit its own blood supply, enabling exponential growth and potential metastasis.
One of the most crucial experiments in Folkman's lab was the development and use of the Rabbit Cornea Assay. The cornea is naturally avascular—it has no blood vessels. This made it the perfect, clear "window" to observe whether a tumor could indeed spur the growth of new vessels from a distance.
The experiment was elegant in its design:
Researchers would take a tiny sample of a cancerous tumor and carefully implant it into a small pocket created in a rabbit's clear cornea, keeping a precise distance from the edge of the cornea where blood vessels reside.
Over the following days, they would observe the cornea daily.
After several days, they witnessed a breathtaking phenomenon. Capillaries from the edge of the cornea began to sprout and grow, like roots searching for water, directly toward the tiny tumor implant.
For comparison, a non-cancerous tissue sample was implanted in the cornea of another rabbit. In this case, no new blood vessels grew.
This was visual, undeniable proof that tumors released a diffusible substance that could actively stimulate angiogenesis.
The results were clear and profound. The data from a typical set of these experiments told a powerful story.
| Tumor Type Implanted | Number of Implants | Implants Showing Angiogenesis (%) | Average Time to Vessel Detection (Days) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Melanoma (Cancerous) | 20 | 19 (95%) | 6.2 |
| Breast Carcinoma (Cancerous) | 18 | 17 (94%) | 5.8 |
| Normal Liver Tissue (Non-cancerous) | 15 | 0 (0%) | N/A |
Further experiments quantified the dependency of the tumor on this new blood supply.
| Distance of Tumor from Cornea Edge (mm) | Maximum Tumor Diameter Achieved (mm) | Observation |
|---|---|---|
| < 1.0 mm | > 5.0 mm | Rapid, expansive growth. |
| 1.0 - 2.0 mm | 2.0 - 4.0 mm | Slower, limited growth. |
| > 2.5 mm | < 1.5 mm | Dormant; no significant growth. |
This data powerfully supported Folkman's original hypothesis: a tumor's growth is physically constrained by its ability to connect to the host's circulatory system. No blood supply, no life.
The search for angiogenesis factors and inhibitors required a specialized set of tools. Here are some of the key reagents and materials that powered this research.
| Research Tool | Function in the Experiment |
|---|---|
| Endothelial Cells | Isolated from blood vessel linings; used in cell culture to test which factors make them proliferate, migrate, or form tube-like structures. |
| Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor (bFGF) | One of the first specific "angiogenic factors" identified; used as a positive control to stimulate vessel growth in assays. |
| Heparin Sepharose Chromatography | A purification technique. Many angiogenic factors stick to heparin, allowing scientists to isolate them from a complex tumor soup. This was key to eventually purifying VEGF. |
| The Cornea Assay | The "gold standard" in vivo (in a living organism) bioassay. It provided undeniable visual proof of angiogenic activity. |
| VEGF Antibodies | Once Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) was identified, antibodies against it could be used to block its function, testing if it was essential for tumor growth. |
Advanced biochemical methods were essential for isolating and identifying the elusive angiogenic factors.
Visual observation was critical for documenting the growth of new blood vessels toward tumors.
Understanding the genetic and molecular basis of angiogenesis was key to developing targeted therapies.
Dr. Folkman's war, once fought from the fringes of science, is now mainstream. His work laid the foundation for an entirely new class of cancer drugs: angiogenesis inhibitors.
The first of these, a drug called Avastin (bevacizumab), is an antibody that precisely targets VEGF, the key "GO" signal Folkman's lab helped identify. It doesn't kill cancer cells directly; it starves them. Today, Avastin and other anti-angiogenic therapies are used worldwide to treat cancers of the colon, lung, kidney, and brain, often turning once-untreatable cancers into manageable chronic conditions.
FDA-approved angiogenesis inhibitors
Types of cancer treated with anti-angiogenic therapy
Patients treated worldwide with angiogenesis inhibitors
The struggle to defeat cancer is far from over. Tumors can become resistant to these drugs. But Judah Folkman's legacy is a paradigm shift. He taught us to see cancer not just as a disease of cells, but as a disease of an entire ecosystem. By daring to think differently, he gave the world a new strategy, new hope, and a powerful new set of weapons in the long war against cancer.