The Russian Thistle's Hidden Foe
How a Tiny Fungus Could Help Control an Invasive Weed
Article Navigation
Introduction
In the vast agricultural landscapes of the western United States, few plants are as despised as the Russian thistle (Salsola tragus L.). This invasive weed, known for forming those familiar tumbleweeds that bounce across roads and fields, costs farmers millions of dollars annually in crop losses and control efforts. But in 2007, along the shores of Russia's Azov Sea, scientists discovered something remarkable: naturally occurring Russian thistle plants were dying. Upon investigation, they found the culprit—a previously unknown fungal pathogen causing stem canker disease. This discovery, published in Plant Disease in January 2009, represented more than just a botanical curiosity; it opened up promising new possibilities for biocontrol strategies against one of America's most problematic weeds 1 2 .
This article explores the scientific journey behind this discovery, from initial field observations to rigorous laboratory verification, and examines how a fungal pathogen named Diaporthe eres might eventually become nature's own solution to the Russian thistle problem.
The Russian Thistle: An Invasive Menace
Why It's Problematic
The Russian thistle, despite its picturesque appearance in Western movies, is a formidable agricultural pest. Originally introduced to the United States in the 1870s through contaminated flax seed, it has since spread across millions of acres of rangeland and cropland.
The plant competes aggressively with crops for water and nutrients, reduces crop yields, and serves as a host for other agricultural pests and diseases. When it dries and breaks loose from its roots, it becomes the classic tumbleweed, scattering up to 250,000 seeds across the landscape as it rolls—a highly efficient dispersal mechanism that makes control exceptionally challenging.
Russian thistle tumbleweeds can spread hundreds of thousands of seeds across landscapes.
Current Control Methods and Their Limitations
Traditional control methods have included:
Herbicide Applications
Costly and environmentally concerning
Mechanical Tillage
Can contribute to soil erosion
Biological Controls
Using insects with varying success rates
The limitations of these approaches have fueled the search for additional biocontrol agents, particularly pathogenic fungi that could specifically target the weed without affecting crops or native plants.
The Discovery: Dying Plants Along the Azov Sea
First Field Observations
In September 2007, researchers noticed dying Russian thistle plants along the Azov Sea at Chushka, Russia. The plants exhibited distinctive symptoms: irregular, necrotic, canker-like lesions near the base of their stems, with many stems showing girdling and cracking. The stem lesions were dark brown and contained brown pycnidia (fungal spore-producing structures) within and extending along otherwise healthy-looking sections of the stems and basal portions of leaves 1 .
Initial Collection and Preservation
Scientists collected samples of these diseased plants, taking care to preserve the fungal structures for further study. These samples would begin a journey that would take them from the Russian coastline to quarantine facilities in the United States, where they would undergo rigorous scientific scrutiny.
The Azov Sea coastline where the diseased Russian thistle plants were discovered.
Unveiling the Culprit: Scientific Identification of the Pathogen
The initial laboratory work involved traditional mycological techniques:
- Surface sterilization of stem pieces with 70% ethyl alcohol
- Placement on potato glucose agar in Petri dishes
- Observation of emerging fungal structures
Within just 2-3 days, numerous dark, immersed erumpent pycnidia with a single ostiole (opening) were observed in all lesions. The researchers then performed detailed microscopic examination, documenting key characteristics 1 :
| Fungal Structure | Description | Size Range | Mean Dimensions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conidiophores | Simple, cylindrical | 5-25 × 2 μm | 12 × 2 μm |
| Alpha conidia | Biguttulate, one-celled, hyaline, nonseptate, ovoid | 6.3-11.5 × 1.3-2.9 μm | 8.8 × 2.0 μm |
| Beta conidia | One-celled, filiform, hamate, hyaline | 11.1-24.9 × 0.3-2.5 μm | 17.7 × 1.2 μm |
Based on these morphological features, the isolate was initially identified as a species of Phomopsis, the conidial (asexual) state of Diaporthe 1 .
To confirm the morphological identification, scientists turned to genetic sequencing. They compared the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequence of their isolate with available sequences in GenBank using BLAST analysis. The results showed 528 of 529 identities with the ITS sequence of an authentic and vouchered Diaporthe eres Nitschke (GenBank DQ491514) 1 .
This molecular confirmation, coupled with the morphological characteristics consistent with Phomopsis oblonga (the anamorph of D. eres), provided compelling evidence for the identity of the pathogen 1 2 .
Proving Pathogenicity: Koch's Postulates in Action
The Experimental Design
To fulfill Koch's postulates (the scientific standard for proving a pathogen-disease relationship), researchers designed a carefully controlled experiment:
Plant preparation
Thirty-day-old Russian thistle plants were grown under controlled conditions.
Inoculum preparation
A conidial suspension was harvested from 14-day-old cultures grown on 20% V8 juice agar, calibrated to a concentration of 1.0 × 10⁶ alpha conidia/ml with the addition of 0.1% polysorbate 20 (a surfactant to help the solution adhere to plant surfaces).
Inoculation
Two groups of plants were established:
- Treatment group: 10 plants sprayed with the conidial suspension
- Control group: 10 plants sprayed with water and surfactant only (no conidia)
Results and Implications
The experiment yielded clear results:
| Time After Inoculation | Observation | Number of Plants Affected |
|---|---|---|
| 14 days | Stem lesions developed | 3 plants |
| 21 days | Additional plants showed symptoms | 3 more plants (6 total) |
| 70 days | All inoculated plants diseased | 10 plants |
| 70 days | Plants dead | 4 plants |
| 70 days | Plants with >75% diseased tissue | 3 plants |
| Entire experiment | Control plants showed symptoms | 0 plants |
The researchers successfully reisolated the Phomopsis state from all diseased plants, thus fulfilling Koch's postulates and confirming D. eres as the causal agent of the stem canker disease on Russian thistle 1 2 .
The Scientist's Toolkit: Key Research Reagents and Methods
Understanding the experimental process requires familiarity with some key laboratory materials and techniques used in phytopathology research:
| Reagent/Medium | Function in Research | Specific Application in This Study |
|---|---|---|
| Potato Glucose Agar | General purpose medium for fungal isolation | Initial isolation of fungus from diseased plant tissue |
| V8 Juice Agar | Specialized medium promoting sporulation | Production of conidia for inoculation experiments |
| 70% Ethyl Alcohol | Surface sterilization | Disinfestation of plant tissue before fungal isolation |
| Polysorbate 20 | Surfactant | Ensuring even coverage of spore suspension on plant surfaces |
| CTAB Buffer | DNA extraction | Extracting high-quality DNA from fungal cultures for molecular identification |
| ITS Primers | DNA amplification | Targeting the ITS region for phylogenetic analysis |
| EF1-α, β-tubulin, CAL Primers | DNA amplification | Additional gene regions used for precise species delimitation |
The Complexity of Diaporthe Taxonomy
Why Accurate Species Identification Matters
The identification of the Russian thistle pathogen as Diaporthe eres places it within a notoriously complex genus with numerous species that are morphologically similar but may have different biological properties. Correct identification is crucial for biocontrol—using the wrong species or strain could be ineffective or even risky for non-target plants 3 .
Advances in Species Delimitation
A comprehensive 2014 study published in Fungal Diversity highlighted the challenges in defining species boundaries within the D. eres complex. The researchers used multi-gene phylogenetic analysis of eight genetic markers to resolve species limits.
They found that the ITS region, while useful for initial identification, showed sequence heterogeneity within D. eres that could complicate analysis and lead to overestimation of species diversity 3 .
Implications for Biological Control
The Potential of D. eres as a Biocontrol Agent
The confirmed pathogenicity of this D. eres isolate on Russian thistle suggests its potential as a biological control agent in regions where the weed is invasive, particularly the western United States. Fungal biocontrol agents offer several potential advantages:
The Road from Discovery to Implementation
The path from discovering a potential biocontrol agent to field application is long and requires extensive testing:
Host specificity testing
Ensuring the fungus doesn't attack crops or native plants
Efficacy studies
Determining optimal application methods and timing
Production and formulation
Developing mass production and delivery systems
Regulatory approval
Meeting requirements of agencies like the USDA APHIS
Implementation and monitoring
Careful deployment and assessment of impacts
Conclusion: Nature's Solutions to Human-Created Problems
The discovery of Diaporthe eres causing stem canker on Russian thistle in Russia represents a fascinating example of how studying plant diseases in their native ranges can yield potential solutions to invasive species problems elsewhere. What began as an observation of dying plants along the Azov Sea has evolved into a promising line of research that might eventually help western U.S. farmers manage one of their most troublesome weeds.
This story also illustrates the evolution of modern plant pathology, from traditional morphological approaches to integrated methods combining careful field observation, sophisticated laboratory culture, and advanced molecular techniques. As we face growing challenges from invasive species and need to reduce reliance on chemical pesticides, such biocontrol approaches—rooted in detailed understanding of natural pathogen-plant relationships—will become increasingly valuable.
The Russian thistle's hidden foe, once identified and understood, may yet become a valuable ally in our ongoing effort to manage invasive species and maintain productive agricultural systems.
This article was based on scientific findings published in Plant Disease (2009) and subsequent research on Diaporthe species taxonomy and biology. All data and experimental details were drawn from the cited scientific literature.